Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

What is Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)?

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is an AI model developed by Google, classified as a vision model. It is a multimodal model, capable of processing text, images, and potentially other media types. As a proprietary model, it is available via Google's cloud API. With a context window of 66K tokens, it is suitable for processing medium-sized documents like articles, reports, and code sections.

Pricing & Costs in 2026

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is usage-based, priced at $0.25/1M input tokens and $1.5/1M output tokens. For context: 1 million tokens is approximately 750,000 words, or about 10 average-length books. At this aggressive price point, it is one of the most cost-effective options on the market, ideal for high-volume applications like chatbots, bulk document analysis, and automation.

Benchmarks & Performance

We don't have detailed benchmark results for Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) yet. Benchmarks are updated weekly as new data becomes available from sources like Artificial Analysis, LM Arena, and LiveBench.

It's important to note that benchmarks measure specific aspects and don't capture the full user experience. Factors like instruction adherence, behavior in long conversations, and real-world task quality vary significantly between models and aren't always reflected in standard scores.

Recommended Use Cases

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) specializes in vision, offering advanced capabilities for creating and processing vision content.

Comparison with Alternatives

In the 2026 AI model ecosystem, Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) competes directly with similarly capable models. Key competitors include GPT (OpenAI), Claude (Anthropic), and open source models like Llama (Meta) and Qwen (Alibaba). The choice between models depends on the specific use case, budget, latency requirements, and need for features like multimodality and tool calling.

For a detailed side-by-side comparison, use our comparison tool or check the overall model ranking.