Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning)

Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning)

Tencenttext#72 of 571 in intelligence

Hy3 is a 295B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model from Tencent (21B active, 192 experts with top-8 routing) built for reasoning, agentic workflows, and real-world production use. It supports a configurable reasoning effort:...

API AvailableTool Calling

Specifications

Context Window

262K tokens

Input Price/1M

$0.06

#224 of 686

Output Price/1M

$0.21

Parameters

Speed

72 tok/s

#176 of 525

Latency (TTFT)

2.8s

Max Output

128K tokens

Cost per Task

433

AA Score / US$ · higher = better

Benchmarks

Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) results on the main AI model evaluation benchmarks. Higher scores indicate better performance.

Coding

BenchmarkScoreMaximumMethodology
AA Coding Index58.8100.0

overall

BenchmarkScoreMaximumMethodology
AA Intelligence Index42.2100.0Artificial Analysis official API

Information

Release date
April 23, 2026
Tool Calling
✅ Supported
Vision
❌ Not supported
Audio
❌ Not supported

Full Analysis: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning)

What is Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning)?

Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) is an AI model developed by Tencent, classified as a text model. It focuses on text processing and natural language generation. As a proprietary model, it is available via Tencent's cloud API. With a context window of 262K tokens, it is suitable for processing long documents such as contracts, books, and complete codebases.

Pricing & Costs in 2026

Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) is usage-based, priced at $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.21/1M output tokens. For context: 1 million tokens is approximately 750,000 words, or about 10 average-length books. At this aggressive price point, it is one of the most cost-effective options on the market, ideal for high-volume applications like chatbots, bulk document analysis, and automation.

Benchmarks & Performance

Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) was evaluated on 2 different benchmarks, covering categories like Coding, overall. Results show moderate performance across available evaluations.

It's important to note that benchmarks measure specific aspects and don't capture the full user experience. Factors like instruction adherence, behavior in long conversations, and real-world task quality vary significantly between models and aren't always reflected in standard scores.

Recommended Use Cases

Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) specializes in text, offering advanced capabilities for creating and processing text content.

Comparison with Alternatives

In the 2026 AI model ecosystem, Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) competes directly with similarly capable models. Tencent competes in this segment against OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Meta. The choice between models depends on the specific use case, budget, latency requirements, and need for features like multimodality and tool calling.

For a detailed side-by-side comparison, use our comparison tool or check the overall model ranking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning)?

Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) is an AI model developed by Tencent. It is a text model.

How much does Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) cost?

Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) costs $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.21/1M output tokens. For heavy usage (e.g., a chatbot handling 100k messages/month), costs can range from $10 to $1,000 depending on volume.

How does Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) compare with other models?

In available benchmarks, Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) scored: AA Coding Index: 58.8/100, AA Intelligence Index: 42.2/100. See the full table above for a detailed comparison.

Is Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) open source?

No, Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) is a proprietary model from Tencent. It is available via cloud API. For open source alternatives, check our open source model ranking.

What is Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) best for?

Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) excels at general-purpose language tasks. With its large context window, it handles long documents, codebases, and extended conversations. It supports tool calling for API integrations and automation.

Last updated: August 18, 2026 View methodology →