Xiaomi • llm
Grande modelo de linguagem (llm) desenvolvido pela Xiaomi — Intelligence Index 45/100 no Artificial Analysis; US$ 0.400/1M tokens de entrada; 102 tokens/s de velocidade.
Context Window
—
Input Price/1M
—
Output Price/1M
—
Parameters
—
MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 results on the main AI model evaluation benchmarks. Higher scores indicate better performance.
| Benchmark | Score | Maximum | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 36.0 | 100.0 | — |
| Benchmark | Score | Maximum | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 68.8 | 100.0 | Contamination-free benchmark with objective ground-truth answers |
| SciCode | 40.0 | 100.0 | — |
| AA Coding Index | 36.9 | 100.0 | Artificial Analysis official API |
| Benchmark | Score | Maximum | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 49.2 | 100.0 | Contamination-free benchmark with objective ground-truth answers |
| Benchmark | Score | Maximum | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 69.1 | 100.0 | Contamination-free benchmark with objective ground-truth answers |
| Benchmark | Score | Maximum | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-LCR | 64.0 | 100.0 | — |
| Benchmark | Score | Maximum | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 77.0 | 100.0 | Contamination-free benchmark with objective ground-truth answers |
| Benchmark | Score | Maximum | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Global | 58.1 | 100.0 | Contamination-free benchmark with objective ground-truth answers |
| AA Intelligence Index | 36.4 | 100.0 | Artificial Analysis official API |
| Benchmark | Score | Maximum | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 86.0 | 100.0 | Artificial Analysis official API |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 69.7 | 100.0 | Contamination-free benchmark with objective ground-truth answers |
| IFBench | 67.0 | 100.0 | — |
| HLE | 20.0 | 100.0 | — |
| Benchmark | Score | Maximum | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tau²-Bench | 88.0 | 100.0 | — |
MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 is an AI model developed by Xiaomi, classified as a llm model. It focuses on text processing and natural language generation. As a proprietary model, it is available via Xiaomi's cloud API.
MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 does not have public per-token pricing available at this time. Some models offer access via enterprise plans or research programs. Check Xiaomi's official website for up-to-date availability and pricing.
MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 was evaluated on 15 different benchmarks, covering categories like Agentic, Coding, Data Analysis, Language, Long Context, Math, overall, Reasoning, Tool Use. Results show solid performance across available evaluations.
It's important to note that benchmarks measure specific aspects and don't capture the full user experience. Factors like instruction adherence, behavior in long conversations, and real-world task quality vary significantly between models and aren't always reflected in standard scores.
MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 is suitable for a wide range of AI applications: text generation, summarization, translation, and general assistance.
In the 2026 AI model ecosystem, MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 competes directly with similarly capable models. Xiaomi competes in this segment against OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Meta. The choice between models depends on the specific use case, budget, latency requirements, and need for features like multimodality and tool calling.
For a detailed side-by-side comparison, use our comparison tool or check the overall model ranking.
MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 is an AI model developed by Xiaomi. It is a llm model.
MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 does not have public per-token pricing available at this time. Check Xiaomi's official website for up-to-date information.
In available benchmarks, MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 scored: Terminal-Bench Hard: 36/100, LiveBench Coding: 68.85/100, SciCode: 40/100. See the full table above for a detailed comparison.
No, MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 is a proprietary model from Xiaomi. It is available via cloud API. For open source alternatives, check our open source model ranking.
MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 excels at general-purpose language tasks.
Last updated: July 17, 2026 • View methodology →