DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)

DeepSeek • text#36 of 697 in intelligence

Data source: Artificial Analysis · ID AA: f151fd0b-2139-40cf-a3ec-995e8cedc592 · Snapshot published: 10/23/2026, 9:00:25 AM · Methodology version: 4.3

API Available

Specifications

AA Intelligence Index

45.1

Artificial Analysis · 4.3 · 10/23/2026, 9:00:25 AM

Context Window

—

Input Price/1M

$0.30

#160 of 442

Output Price/1M

$1.20

Parameters

—

Speed

204 tok/s

#20 of 165

Latency (TTFT)

1.0s

Cost per Task

$0.262

USD / task · lower is better · Artificial Analysis · 4.3 · 10/23/2026, 9:00:25 AM

Benchmarks

Artificial Analysis metrics for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max). Higher is better for capability indexes; lower is better for cost per task.

Cost

BenchmarkScoreMaximumMethodologySource / version / date
AA Cost Per Task0.3100.0Artificial Analysis official APIArtificial Analysis · 4.3 · 10/23/2026

overall

BenchmarkScoreMaximumMethodologySource / version / date
AA Intelligence Index45.1100.0Artificial Analysis official APIArtificial Analysis · 4.3 · 10/23/2026

Information

Release date
October 17, 2026
Tool Calling
❌ Not supported
Vision
❌ Not supported
Audio
❌ Not supported

Full Analysis: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)

What is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is an AI model developed by DeepSeek, classified as a text model. It focuses on text processing and natural language generation. As a proprietary model, it is available via DeepSeek's cloud API.

Pricing & Costs in 2026

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is usage-based, priced at $0.3/1M input tokens and $1.2/1M output tokens. For context: 1 million tokens is approximately 750,000 words, or about 10 average-length books. At this aggressive price point, it is one of the most cost-effective options on the market, ideal for high-volume applications like chatbots, bulk document analysis, and automation.

Benchmarks & Performance

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) was evaluated on 2 different benchmarks, covering categories like Cost, overall. Results show moderate performance across available evaluations.

It's important to note that benchmarks measure specific aspects and don't capture the full user experience. Factors like instruction adherence, behavior in long conversations, and real-world task quality vary significantly between models and aren't always reflected in standard scores.

Recommended Use Cases

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) specializes in text, offering advanced capabilities for creating and processing text content.

Comparison with Alternatives

In the 2026 AI model ecosystem, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) competes directly with similarly capable models. DeepSeek competes in this segment against OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Meta. The choice between models depends on the specific use case, budget, latency requirements, and need for features like multimodality and tool calling.

For a detailed side-by-side comparison, use our comparison tool or check the overall model ranking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is an AI model developed by DeepSeek. It is a text model.

How much does DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) cost?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) costs $0.3/1M input tokens and $1.2/1M output tokens. For heavy usage (e.g., a chatbot handling 100k messages/month), costs can range from $10 to $1,000 depending on volume.

How does DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) compare with other models?

In available benchmarks, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) scored: AA Cost Per Task: 0.262/100, AA Intelligence Index: 45.1/100. See the full table above for a detailed comparison.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) open source?

No, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is a proprietary model from DeepSeek. It is available via cloud API. For open source alternatives, check our open source model ranking.

What is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) best for?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) excels at general-purpose language tasks.

Last updated: October 23, 2026 • View methodology →