MiniMax-M3

MiniMax-M3

MiniMaxtext

MiniMax-M3 is a multimodal foundation model from MiniMax. It supports text, image, and video inputs with text output, a 1M-token context window, and is suited for long-horizon agentic work, coding,...

API AvailableVisionTool Calling

Specifications

Context Window

1.0M tokens

Input Price/1M

$0.30

Output Price/1M

$1.20

Parameters

Speed

46 tok/s

Latency (TTFT)

2.6s

Max Output

512K tokens

Benchmarks

MiniMax-M3 results on the main AI model evaluation benchmarks. Higher scores indicate better performance.

Agentic

BenchmarkScoreMaximumMethodology
Terminal-Bench Hard42.0100.0

Coding

BenchmarkScoreMaximumMethodology
SciCode45.0100.0
AA Coding Index43.4100.0Artificial Analysis official API

Long Context

BenchmarkScoreMaximumMethodology
AA-LCR74.0100.0

overall

BenchmarkScoreMaximumMethodology
AA Intelligence Index54.7100.0Artificial Analysis official API

Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreMaximumMethodology
GPQA Diamond93.0100.0Artificial Analysis official API
IFBench83.0100.0
HLE37.0100.0

Tool Use

BenchmarkScoreMaximumMethodology
Tau²-Bench89.0100.0

Information

Release date
June 01, 2026
Tool Calling
✅ Supported
Vision
✅ Supported
Audio
❌ Not supported

Full Analysis: MiniMax-M3

What is MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is an AI model developed by MiniMax, classified as a text model. It focuses on text processing and natural language generation. As a proprietary model, it is available via MiniMax's cloud API. With a context window of 1.0M tokens, it is suitable for processing long documents such as contracts, books, and complete codebases.

Pricing & Costs in 2026

MiniMax-M3 is usage-based, priced at $0.3/1M input tokens and $1.2/1M output tokens. For context: 1 million tokens is approximately 750,000 words, or about 10 average-length books. At this aggressive price point, it is one of the most cost-effective options on the market, ideal for high-volume applications like chatbots, bulk document analysis, and automation.

Benchmarks & Performance

MiniMax-M3 was evaluated on 9 different benchmarks, covering categories like Agentic, Coding, Long Context, overall, Reasoning, Tool Use. Results show exceptional performance across available evaluations.

It's important to note that benchmarks measure specific aspects and don't capture the full user experience. Factors like instruction adherence, behavior in long conversations, and real-world task quality vary significantly between models and aren't always reflected in standard scores.

Recommended Use Cases

MiniMax-M3 specializes in text, offering advanced capabilities for creating and processing text content.

Comparison with Alternatives

In the 2026 AI model ecosystem, MiniMax-M3 competes directly with similarly capable models. MiniMax competes in this segment against OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Meta. The choice between models depends on the specific use case, budget, latency requirements, and need for features like multimodality and tool calling.

For a detailed side-by-side comparison, use our comparison tool or check the overall model ranking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is an AI model developed by MiniMax. It is a text model.

How much does MiniMax-M3 cost?

MiniMax-M3 costs $0.3/1M input tokens and $1.2/1M output tokens. For heavy usage (e.g., a chatbot handling 100k messages/month), costs can range from $10 to $1,000 depending on volume.

How does MiniMax-M3 compare with other models?

In available benchmarks, MiniMax-M3 scored: Terminal-Bench Hard: 42/100, SciCode: 45/100, AA Coding Index: 43.4/100. See the full table above for a detailed comparison.

Is MiniMax-M3 open source?

No, MiniMax-M3 is a proprietary model from MiniMax. It is available via cloud API. For open source alternatives, check our open source model ranking.

What is MiniMax-M3 best for?

MiniMax-M3 excels at multimodal tasks including text and vision. With its large context window, it handles long documents, codebases, and extended conversations. It supports tool calling for API integrations and automation.

Last updated: June 11, 2026 View methodology →