Objective comparison based on public benchmarks updated weekly: Intelligence Index, GPQA Diamond, Chatbot Arena ELO, pricing and speed.
Anthropic
ELO Arena
1503
Intelligence Index
53.5
Coding Index
73.6
4 criteria won
View full profile →| Critério | Llama 4 Maverick | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Chatbot Arena ELO | — | 1503 ✓ |
| Intelligence Index (AA) | 14.3 | 53.5 ✓ |
| Coding Index (AA) | 16.3 | 73.6 ✓ |
| GPQA Diamond | 67.0% | 91.0% ✓ |
| Input price ($/1M tok) | $0.35 ✓ | $5.00 |
| Output price ($/1M tok) | $0.85 ✓ | $25.00 |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens ✓ | 1.0M tokens |
| Speed (tokens/s) | 109 tok/s ✓ | 42 tok/s |
✓ = winner in this criterion • Source: Artificial Analysis, LMArena, official APIs • Updated weekly
Choosing between Llama 4 Maverick and Claude Opus 4.7 depends on your use case, budget and technical requirements. Below, a practical guide based on benchmark data and each model's specifications.
Meta · Multimodal · Open Source
Anthropic · Multimodal
Llama 4 Maverick and Claude Opus 4.7 are evenly matched in this comparison. Choose based on the criterion most important for your project.
Data is aggregated from Artificial Analysis (Intelligence Index, Coding Index) and Chatbot Arena/LMArena (ELO). Pricing and specs come from official APIs. Updated weekly.
The Intelligence Index is an aggregate score from Artificial Analysis that combines multiple academic benchmarks (MMLU, GPQA, LiveBench, etc.) into a single rating. The higher the score, the more capable the model is at reasoning tasks.
Yes. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.35/1M input tokens, while Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5/1M tokens — 1329% more expensive. For high-volume projects, Llama 4 Maverick represents significant savings. Total cost also depends on output pricing and your application's usage pattern.
Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window: 1.0M tokens vs 1.0M tokens. For long document analysis, extensive transcripts or full codebases, the larger context window is a decisive criterion.