Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (max)Benchmark Comparison 2026

Objective comparison based on public benchmarks updated weekly: Intelligence Index, Chatbot Arena ELO, pricing and speed.

Overall winner (2026)

Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)

4 of 7 criteria won

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)

Winner

ELO Arena

1501

Intelligence Index

53.4

Coding Index

81.6

4 criteria won

View full profile →

OpenAI

GPT-6.1 Sol (max)

Intelligence Index

51.8

3 criteria won

View full profile →

Detailed Comparison

CritérioClaude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)GPT-6.1 Sol (max)
Chatbot Arena ELO1501 ✓—
Intelligence Index (AA)53.4 ✓51.8
Coding Index (AA)81.6 ✓—
Input price ($/1M tok)$10.00$2.00 ✓
Output price ($/1M tok)$50.00$10.00 ✓
Context window1.0M tokens1.1M tokens ✓
Speed (tokens/s)68 tok/s ✓64 tok/s

✓ = winner in this criterion • Source: Artificial Analysis, LMArena, official APIs • Updated weekly

Technical Specifications

Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)

Company
Anthropic
Context window
1.0M tokens
Input ($/1M tok)
$10.00
Output ($/1M tok)
$50.00
Speed
68 tok/s
Release
Sep 2026
Multimodal
No
Open Source
No

GPT-6.1 Sol (max)

Company
OpenAI
Context window
1.1M tokens
Input ($/1M tok)
$2.00
Output ($/1M tok)
$10.00
Speed
64 tok/s
Release
Sep 2026
Multimodal
No
Open Source
No

When to use Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (max)?

Choosing between Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) and GPT-6.1 Sol (max) depends on your use case, budget and technical requirements. Below, a practical guide based on benchmark data and each model's specifications.

Use Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) when:

Anthropic · Text

  • →Critical tasks where maximum quality justifies premium cost — ideal for one-off high-value decisions
  • →Long document analysis — 1.0M tokens context window allows processing books, legal databases and extensive logs
  • →API integration in SaaS applications — direct API access with documented SLA
View full Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) profile →

Use GPT-6.1 Sol (max) when:

OpenAI · Text

  • →Long document analysis — 1.1M tokens context window allows processing books, legal databases and extensive logs
  • →API integration in SaaS applications — direct API access with documented SLA
View full GPT-6.1 Sol (max) profile →
SWEN Verdict: Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) wins in more objective criteria in this comparison (4 vs 3). For most use cases, Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) offers better aggregate performance — but GPT-6.1 Sol (max) may be preferable if your project prioritizes long document analysis.

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) or GPT-6.1 Sol (max): which is better?

Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) wins in 4 of 7 criteria analyzed. Check the full table to choose based on your use case.

Where does this benchmark data come from?

Data is aggregated from Artificial Analysis (Intelligence Index, Coding Index) and Chatbot Arena/LMArena (ELO). Pricing and specs come from official APIs. Updated weekly.

What is the Intelligence Index?

The Intelligence Index is an aggregate score from Artificial Analysis that combines multiple academic benchmarks (MMLU, GPQA, LiveBench, etc.) into a single rating. The higher the score, the more capable the model is at reasoning tasks.

Is Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol (max)?

No. GPT-6.1 Sol (max) is cheaper: $2/1M input tokens vs $10/1M tokens for Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) — a 400% difference. For high-volume projects, GPT-6.1 Sol (max) can reduce costs substantially.

Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) or GPT-6.1 Sol (max): which has a larger context window?

GPT-6.1 Sol (max) has the larger context window: 1.1M tokens vs 1.0M tokens. For long document analysis, extensive transcripts or full codebases, the larger context window is a decisive criterion.

Other Comparisons