Objective comparison based on public benchmarks updated weekly: Intelligence Index, Chatbot Arena ELO, pricing and speed.
Anthropic
Intelligence Index
57.6
3 criteria won
View full profile →| Critério | Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) | Gemini 4 Argon (High) |
|---|---|---|
| Chatbot Arena ELO | — | 1525 ✓ |
| Intelligence Index (AA) | 57.6 ✓ | 52.6 |
| Coding Index (AA) | — | — |
| Input price ($/1M tok) | $4.00 | $2.00 ✓ |
| Output price ($/1M tok) | $20.00 | $10.00 ✓ |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens ✓ | — |
| Speed (tokens/s) | 92 tok/s ✓ | — |
✓ = winner in this criterion • Source: Artificial Analysis, LMArena, official APIs • Updated weekly
Choosing between Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) and Gemini 4 Argon (High) depends on your use case, budget and technical requirements. Below, a practical guide based on benchmark data and each model's specifications.
Anthropic · Text
Google · Text
Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) and Gemini 4 Argon (High) are evenly matched in this comparison. Choose based on the criterion most important for your project.
Data is aggregated from Artificial Analysis (Intelligence Index, Coding Index) and Chatbot Arena/LMArena (ELO). Pricing and specs come from official APIs. Updated weekly.
The Intelligence Index is an aggregate score from Artificial Analysis that combines multiple academic benchmarks (MMLU, GPQA, LiveBench, etc.) into a single rating. The higher the score, the more capable the model is at reasoning tasks.
No. Gemini 4 Argon (High) is cheaper: $2/1M input tokens vs $4/1M tokens for Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) — a 100% difference. For high-volume projects, Gemini 4 Argon (High) can reduce costs substantially.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) has a context window of 1.0M tokens. Context window data for Gemini 4 Argon (High) is not publicly available.