Objective comparison based on public benchmarks updated weekly: Intelligence Index, Chatbot Arena ELO, pricing and speed.
Overall winner (2026)
Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
5 of 5 criteria won
Anthropic
Intelligence Index
57.6
5 criteria won
View full profile →| Critério | Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) | Muse Wonder Full (Max) |
|---|---|---|
| Chatbot Arena ELO | — | — |
| Intelligence Index (AA) | 57.6 ✓ | 55.8 |
| Coding Index (AA) | — | — |
| Input price ($/1M tok) | $4.00 ✓ | — |
| Output price ($/1M tok) | $20.00 ✓ | — |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens ✓ | — |
| Speed (tokens/s) | 97 tok/s ✓ | — |
✓ = winner in this criterion • Source: Artificial Analysis, LMArena, official APIs • Updated weekly
Choosing between Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) and Muse Wonder Full (Max) depends on your use case, budget and technical requirements. Below, a practical guide based on benchmark data and each model's specifications.
Anthropic · Text
Meta · Text
Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) wins in 5 of 5 criteria analyzed. Check the full table to choose based on your use case.
Data is aggregated from Artificial Analysis (Intelligence Index, Coding Index) and Chatbot Arena/LMArena (ELO). Pricing and specs come from official APIs. Updated weekly.
The Intelligence Index is an aggregate score from Artificial Analysis that combines multiple academic benchmarks (MMLU, GPQA, LiveBench, etc.) into a single rating. The higher the score, the more capable the model is at reasoning tasks.
Detailed pricing data is not available for one or both models. Check the companies' official pages for updated pricing.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) has a context window of 1.0M tokens. Context window data for Muse Wonder Full (Max) is not publicly available.