Objective comparison based on public benchmarks updated weekly: Intelligence Index, Chatbot Arena ELO, pricing and speed.
Overall winner (2026)
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
5 of 6 criteria won
Anthropic
Intelligence Index
53.4
Coding Index
81.6
5 criteria won
View full profile →| Critério | Muse Wonder Full (Max) | Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) |
|---|---|---|
| Chatbot Arena ELO | — | — |
| Intelligence Index (AA) | 55.8 ✓ | 53.4 |
| Coding Index (AA) | — | 81.6 ✓ |
| Input price ($/1M tok) | — | $10.00 ✓ |
| Output price ($/1M tok) | — | $50.00 ✓ |
| Context window | — | 1.0M tokens ✓ |
| Speed (tokens/s) | — | 71 tok/s ✓ |
✓ = winner in this criterion • Source: Artificial Analysis, LMArena, official APIs • Updated weekly
Choosing between Muse Wonder Full (Max) and Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) depends on your use case, budget and technical requirements. Below, a practical guide based on benchmark data and each model's specifications.
Meta · Text
Anthropic · Text
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) wins in 5 of 6 criteria analyzed. Check the full table to choose based on your use case.
Data is aggregated from Artificial Analysis (Intelligence Index, Coding Index) and Chatbot Arena/LMArena (ELO). Pricing and specs come from official APIs. Updated weekly.
The Intelligence Index is an aggregate score from Artificial Analysis that combines multiple academic benchmarks (MMLU, GPQA, LiveBench, etc.) into a single rating. The higher the score, the more capable the model is at reasoning tasks.
Detailed pricing data is not available for one or both models. Check the companies' official pages for updated pricing.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) has a context window of 1.0M tokens. Context window data for Muse Wonder Full (Max) is not publicly available.